Categories
5 For Writing

Vigorous Writing: What Do You Do When Your Novel ‘Hits the Wall’? by Doug Peterson

Marathon runners and novelists share one thing in common. They both have to deal with “hitting the wall.”

Although I ran cross-country in high school (I was terrible), I have never run a marathon. But from what I understand, marathon runners often hit a wall anywhere from around mile 15 to mile 20—somewhere past the mid point.

By mile 15, you have depleted your glycogen stores, which were built up from whatever you ate before the race. Suddenly, your body is breaking down muscle and fat tissue, and your mind is beginning to fog up. Fatigue hits you like…well, like a wall.

This description sounds an awful lot like a writer at the midpoint of a novel. For writers, ideas are our glycogen stores, and when we hit the midpoint of our novel, we often find ourselves sorely lacking in fresh ideas. We may have gotten off to a quick start and we may even know how we want to end the novel, but we’ve run out of good ideas to carry us through the murky middle.

In fact, this happened to me recently. I had plenty of good ideas that carried me about three-quarters of the way through my novel—and I have a pretty good idea how I want to finish the story. But I have hit a wall. The ideas are used up, and my brain is beginning to fog. This is where a lot of runners—and writers—are tempted to toss in the towel.

For runners, one recommendation to deal with this problem is to refuel your body throughout the race with water, Gatorade, or carbohydrates before you hit the wall. If you wait until you hit the wall, you’re in for a lot of pain.

It’s the same with writers. If you look ahead and see that your ideas are running thin, don’t want for the pain to set in. Stop what you’re doing, brainstorm, replenish your ideas, and then do a little more outlining before moving forward.

I like to meet a daily writing quota, so the idea of stopping the process to do more brainstorming and outlining is frustrating; it feels like I’m going nowhere. So I have to force myself to take the time necessary to replenish my ideas—but it pays off in the long run.

Another tip that trainers often give to runners as they approach the wall is to interact with spectators along the route. This might be something as simple as waving, talking to spectators, or giving a thumbs-up. Some sports psychologists also suggest having a running buddy with whom to interact. All of this interaction has the dual benefit of distracting you from your pain and giving you the encouragement you need.

Again, writers can borrow this advice. When you hit the wall, turn to others for help.

Many of us are attracted to writing because it’s a solitary sport, and you like working alone. But there are points when you need somebody that you can bounce your ideas off of. You need a little help from your friends.

The good news is that if you keep pushing, keep brainstorming, keep outlining, and keep bouncing ideas off of friends, you might find yourself moving into what runners call the “final kick.” A runner’s body, which only miles ago verged on giving up, will suddenly summon up newfound energy in the final few miles of a marathon. Likewise, a writer who felt like giving up only a half dozen chapters earlier will kick into high gear, and the ideas will start coming fast and furious.

So stick with it, and you’ll find it worth it in the end as you cross the finish line and put the last period on the last sentence of the last paragraph of your novel.

Then, just like a marathon runner, it’s time to collapse. And celebrate.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Vigorous Writing: Throwing a Curve Without Destroying Your Plot by Doug Peterson

By Doug Peterson

My arm felt like it was going to fall off.

I was in my forties at the time, and I was pitching batting practice to a bunch of high school baseball players. In batting practice, my usual goal was just to get the pitch over the plate—nothing fancy. But for some strange reason, on this day I decided to throw my first curveball since my high school days.

Bad choice.

When throwing a curve, you bring your arm down in a twisting motion that is not natural for a normal arm—especially a 40-year-old arm. My elbow ached for hours, and I have never thrown a curveball since.

So what in the world does this have to do with writing?

Writers are always searching for ways to throw a curveball to their readers—ways to give them an unexpected twist that catches them unaware. But, just like in baseball, if you don’t throw a curve at your readers in the correct way, your story will suffer as badly as my elbow did on that day when I pitched batting practice.

If we break down the mechanics of throwing a curveball in baseball, we can learn something about throwing a curve in writing.

Get a grip on your characters. When throwing a curve in baseball, it’s all about the grip. How you position your fingers helps to determine the rotation of the ball.

Similarly, in writing a story, it’s all about getting a good grip on your characters. When you understand your characters—their motivations, their desires, and their fears—you stand a better chance of figuring out a twist in their storyline. The twist will rise up naturally.

Set up your reader for an unexpected curve. A good pitcher mixes it up, so the batter doesn’t know what to expect. Will he be throwing a fastball, slider, curve, or what?

It’s the same with writing. Give your story the freedom to go off in multiple directions that even you do not anticipate. Don’t be locked into one set storyline.

As you think about the many paths that your character might follow, jot them all down. Then ask: Which paths are too obvious? Which path will propel the story in exciting and surprising ways? Which path will create the most tension and conflict?

Be natural. The ending to the classic baseball movie, The Natural, is quite predictable. But the movie does include a nice twist or two leading up to this dramatic (but inevitable) ending.

A good twist is surprising but doesn’t seem artificial or forced. To use the title of the movie, a good twist should feel natural. It should surprise the reader but also leave them thinking, “Oh yeah. I should’ve seen that coming.”

A good twist is logical and organic to the story, while an arbitrary, ineffective curve comes out of left field…or right field…or center field. So think it through. After all, you don’t have another writer warming up in the bullpen to bail you out. The ball is in your hands. So is your story’s plot.

* * *

 5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Vigorous Writing: Don’t Let Useless Words Drag You Down

I’m old enough to remember when Olympic sprinters wore baggy shorts. But if you look at the world’s greatest runners today, you’ll see them wearing bodysuits so tight that it must’ve taken an entire coaching staff working all day just to squeeze them into it.

The reason: aerodynamics.

In a field where a hundredth of a second makes all the difference in the world, runners will do anything to cut their times. Switching to bodysuits reduces wind resistance and, therefore, drag—although from what I have read, the improvement is much greater for swimmers than runners.

It also helps with your writing.

However, before you run out and buy a bodysuit to wear while you’re typing on your keyboard, let me make clear that this is a writing metaphor. Just as a little bit of loose material can add drag to a runner or swimmer, excess words can drag down your writing.

As William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White say in their classic book, The Elements of Style, “Vigorous writing is concise.” Therefore, “omit needless words” is elementary principle #13 in their book.

Or, to put it another way…Reduce drag.

Here are just a few examples of needless words and phrases that come from Strunk and White and a couple of other sources:

Instead of writing…                                           Use…

“the question as to whether”                                   “whether” or “the question whether”

“there is no doubt but that”                                    “no doubt” or “doubtless”

“he is a man who”                                                     “he”

“His story is a strange one.”                                    “His story is strange.”

“at the time that” or “at the time when”               “when”

“in the affirmative” or “in the negative”               Just say “no” or “yes.”

“at the present time”                                                “now” or “today”

“inasmuch as”                                                            “because” or “since”

“in regard to”                                                             “about” or “regarding” or “concerning”

I recently encountered a blog entitled “Omit Needless Rules,” which takes a potshot at this guideline from Strunk and White. The writer then offers examples that have little to nothing to do with the guideline, “Omit needless words.”

For instance, he quotes a passage from William Faulkner in which a character’s thoughts keep repeating. He uses this example to argue that if you omitted the repetitive words, the passage would have lost its impact. I agree, but I don’t think Strunk and White were saying that all repeated words are “needless words.” In the context of Faulkner’s story, the repetitions were important, and they helped us to get inside the character’s head.

So the guideline still applies.

Another example offered by this blog writer came from Shakespeare, who wrote, “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace from day to day.”

Here, the repetition of “tomorrow” gives the lines rhythm and emphasis. The repetition makes the writing more vigorous, not less.

Again…This is not what Strunk and White are talking about when they say, “Omit needless words.” They’re not taking aim at poetry where words and phrases might be repeated for good reason. They’re taking aim at useless, blah phrases, such as “the fact that…”

Here are a few “fact that” examples to watch out for:

Instead of writing…                               Use…

“owing to the fact that”                                “since” or “because”

“in spite of the fact that”                              “though” or “although”

“I was unaware of the fact that”                 “I was unaware that”

“in actual fact”                                               “actually” (or just drop it)

You get the idea. The phrase “the fact that” is not exactly Shakespearean in its power. It’s not poetry. It’s useless, and the accumulation of such phrases just slows down your writing and drains it of energy—king of like baggy shorts flapping in the breeze.

For the reader, it’s nothing but a drag.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing

My 5 Rules for Writing

Snoopy

My favorite canine writer, Snoopy of Peanuts fame, received a boatload of rejection slips in his pursuit of a publisher over the years, and some of them are gems.

“Dear contributor, thank you for submitting your story to our magazine,” one publisher wrote to Snoopy. “To save time, we are enclosing two rejection slips…one for this story and one for the next story you send us.”

In publishing, it’s a dog-eat-dog world.

That’s why there is no shortage of advice on writing and getting published. For instance, five commonly quoted rules on writing and finding a publisher came from Robert Heinlein, the famed science fiction writer. Heinlein’s five rules are:

  1. You must write.
  2. You must finish what you write.
  3. You must refrain from rewriting, except to editorial order.
  4. You must put the work on the market.
  5. You must keep the work on the market until it is sold.

Four of these rules are excellent for both beginning and experienced writers, but I find Rule 3 on the strange side, as do many people; in fact, one online post about these rules comes with an Aspiring Author Warning—“Don’t try #3 at home.” From what I understand, Heinlein admitted that he did revise and rewrite, so I’m not sure where that rule even came from.

Regardless of the oddness of Rule 3, this time-tested list got me thinking about what rules I have subconsciously followed during my 38 years of writing since graduating from journalism school in 1977. So I came up with my “5 for Writing.

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  1. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  1. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  1. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  1. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

Note that my Rules 1 and 3 correspond to Heinlein’s 1 and 2. Every list of writing rules probably needs those two because starting and finishing are the two greatest obstacles. As the poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow once said, “Great is the art of beginning, but greater is the art of ending.”

As for Rule 2, it takes time to find a reliable circle of friends and colleagues who give you honest and helpful feedback. But it’s critical. Rule 5 may not be for everyone, but I work best when I’m juggling several projects. And if the idea of writing more than one story at a time makes your brain hurt, at least try to get multiple manuscripts on the market; it only increases your odds of finding a publisher.

Finally, my “thrive on rejection” rule was inspired by an old episode of the TV show M*A*S*H when Hawkeye Pierce said something to the effect of “I thrive on rejection.” Hawkeye was talking about not giving up when it came to finding a woman, but I have found that this philosophy also applies to finding publishers. (Both can be heart-breaking pursuits.)

In my forthcoming blogs, I intend that each installment will fall under one of these five rules—and if it doesn’t I’ll find a way to shoehorn it in. In the meantime, try to maintain the same indefatigable spirit of Snoopy—the only writer to ever have a mailbox run away from him when he tried to send off a new manuscript.

So what was Snoopy’s response to his many rejections? He once wrote back to a publisher by saying, “Gentleman, regarding the recent rejection slip you sent me. I think there might have been a misunderstanding. What I really wanted was for you to publish my story, and send me fifty thousand dollars.”

After a pause, Snoopy added…

“Didn’t you realize that?”

Now that’s a dog who thrives on rejection.

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing

The Proof is in the Pudding–and in the Proofing

By Doug Peterson

The expression, “The proof is in the pudding,” goes back hundreds of years, although the original wording was a bit different. The longer version said, “The proof of the pudding is in the eating.”

Back then, pudding wasn’t a creamy dessert that you eat with a spoon; it actually referred to sausage and meats stuffed into animal intestines. Because it was tricky keeping meats safe without refrigeration, you had to test the food with small bites to make sure it didn’t make your stomach do somersaults. So the “proof of the pudding is in the eating” meant you had to carefully sample the meat. Today, the expression means that you don’t know if something really works until it’s been tried or used.

When it comes to writing, however, you don’t know if a story really works until it’s been edited…and edited…and edited. The proof is in the pudding—and in the proofing.

I can be a bit obsessive when it comes to proofing text. You might even say that I have OCD—Obsessive Copyediting Disorder. Back when I was primarily writing 1,000-word magazine articles, I would edit a story until I got it to just where I wanted it—and then I’d proof it another 20 or more times to polish it up.

It’s a bit more difficult to be that obsessive when I’m dealing with a 90,000-word novel, rather than a 1,000-word magazine story, but I still go over the manuscript with a fine-tooth comb—an expression, by the way, that comes from using a comb to pick out lice eggs, or nits, from a person’s hair. That’s also where we get the expression “nitpicky.”

Here are some of the techniques that I use to nitpick as I edit a story:

1. Proof the story in print. I don’t think I’m alone when I say that it’s much, much easier to notice mistakes on paper than on the screen. A text can look immaculate on the computer screen, but as soon as I print it out and proof it on paper, other mistakes suddenly start jumping out at me. Therefore, I do all of my initial editing on-screen. Then, once I feel good about a story, I print it out and do the rest of my editing on paper. It makes a difference. A huge difference.

2. Read you story out loud. When you read something out loud, you hear things that you wouldn’t notice by reading it in your head. You get a better sense of the flow of sentences, and you’re more likely to notice the repetition of certain words in a sentence. When you read silently, your mind may automatically skim over words, but you can’t do that when you’re reading aloud. It forces you to read every single word, and your proofing is more thorough.

If it’s a short magazine story, I might read it out loud several times during the editing process. But if it’s a novel, I can read only a small section at any one time. So I spread out the chore, trying to read each chapter out loud at least once. I might read Chapter 20 aloud on one day, and Chapter 21 aloud the next day.

3. In addition to reading the entire book or story out loud, read the dialogue by itself. Running through the dialogue tells you whether the words sound natural or forced. Would a real person talk like that? You might even do a bit of play-acting, speaking the lines as you imagine the characters would talk.

This strategy is especially important when writing screenplays.

4. Set your story aside overnight. When I set a story or chapter aside for a night or two and then return to it, I come back to it with fresh eyes and notice things I didn’t see before.

5. Edit a story until you’re sick of it. When I’m starting to get sick of proofing a story, that means I’m getting close to the end of the process.

Finally, when you’re done with your story, find a person whose judgment you trust, and then let them take a whack at your manuscript and give you feedback. After all, the proof is not just in the pudding. It’s also in your readers, especially nitpicky readers.

* * *

5 for Writing

  • Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  • Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  • Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  • Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  • Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.
Categories
5 For Writing

Do it Again! Taking Readers on a Fantastic Voyage

By Doug Peterson

I will never forget the day my parents took me to the theater to see the movie Fantastic Voyage—a sci-fi thriller in which a crew is inserted into a ship, shrunk to a microscopic size, and then injected inside a human body. I can’t remember their specific mission, only that it had to do with saving the life of the patient.

What I do remember is my sense of wonder.

I’m dating myself by bringing up this movie because Fantastic Voyage came out in 1966—a time when special effects were a far cry from today. But I had never seen anything like it, so when their sub began zipping through the bloodstream, my eyes almost popped from my head. I remember the looks on the faces of the characters as they stared out of the sub’s window in wonderment as blood cells floated all around them like gigantic jellyfish. These people were inside a human body!

Last year, Fantastic Voyage was streaming on Netflix, so I decided to check out the movie, which I hadn’t seen since I was 11 years old. I couldn’t believe that I actually loved this movie. Films back then moved at a much slower pace, but this one moved at a glacier speed. It seemed to take forever for the scientists to finally shrink the ship to microscopic size.

A lot of my disappointment had to do with advances in special effects, obviously. But it was more than that. The wonder of being inside the body was no longer there.

Some of the loss of wonder has to do with age. As we get older, we lose this sense of amazement—but a good story, particularly a good fantasy or science fiction story, recaptures this sense of astonishment. In his essay, On Fairy-Stories, J.R.R. Tolkien, author of The Lord of the Rings, calls this “Recovery.” He says that a good fantasy story helps us to recover a sense of wonder.

Tolkien says Recovery is a “regaining of a clear view.” It’s a way of seeing things “as we are meant to see them.” He compares it to cleaning our windows so we can look outside and see things as they are meant to be seen. We are “freed from the drab blur of familiarity.”

For those who have eyeglasses, another analogy is when you pick up your new prescription and suddenly the world look sharper and seemingly more colorful. This is Recovery. This is what every good story should do—help people see the world in a brilliant new way.

Tolkien’s idea of Recovery actually comes from G.K. Chesterton, a writer who inspired both Tolkien and Narnia author C.S. Lewis. In his book, Orthodoxy, Chesterton says that fairy tales tell us “that apples were golden only to refresh the forgotten moment when we found that they were green. They make rivers run with wine only to make us remember, for one wild moment, that they run with water.”

With age comes wisdom—and weariness. We become weary with the world, and we forget to see the wonder.

In one of my favorite passages, Chesterton says that adults have lost the ability to “exult in monotony” because we think we have seen it all. To make his point, he talks about how when children love something, they want it to be repeated over and over and over again. Children do this because they have an excess, not an absence, of life.

“Because children have abounding vitality, because they are in spirit fierce and free, therefore they want things repeated and unchanged,” Chesterton writes in Orthodoxy. “They always say, ‘Do it again’; and the grown-up person does it against until he is nearly dead. For grown-up people are not strong enough to exult in monotony.”

Chesterton proceeds to point out that God also has an abundance of life, and He too is strong enough to exult in monotony.

“It is possible that God says every morning, ‘Do it again’ to the sun; and every evening, ‘Do it again’ to the moon. It may not be automatic necessity that makes all daisies alike; it may be that God makes every daisy separately, but has never got tired of making them. It may be that He has the eternal appetite of infancy; for we have sinned and grown old, and our father is younger that we.”

So strive for this sense of wonder in your stories, especially if you’re writing the kinds of stories that carry readers into new worlds, which are designed to remind us of how miraculous our own world is.

If you do, then your readers might just exclaim, “Do it again” when they reach the end of your story.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing

Waltzing With Potatoes: Brainstorming for VeggieTales

By Doug Peterson

The voice on the other end of the line was Bob the Tomato.

It was a Sunday night, and Phil Vischer, the voice of Bob and founder of VeggieTales, was calling to invite me to brainstorm ideas for their next video. If I recall correctly, I had about a week to 10 days to submit ideas for the next Larry-Boy video, so I aimed at submitting at least one per day. I was competing with about a dozen other freelance writers, so I wanted to fire off as many ideas as possible—a shotgun approach.

Little did I know that they would choose the very first idea that I submitted—an idea that became the video, Larry-Boy and the Rumor Weed.

I bring this up because I want to talk about brainstorming—a process that is pretty much the same for me, whether I’m coming up with ideas for books or ideas for a Larry-Boy video. It’s a process that I like to think of as a dance of sorts, especially when it comes to brainstorming for singing vegetables. As the VeggieTales theme song famously says, “If you like to waltz with potatoes…”

My wife and I have taken ballroom dancing a few different times, despite my penchant for stepping on toes. So I can see some similarities between dancing and writing, because there is inevitably going to be some stumbling around in both processes.

When done properly, dancing looks easy and flows seamlessly, but it takes a lot of practice to get to that point, going over the steps again and again and again. In the same way, a good story flow gracefully off the page, but it takes a lot of hard work to get to that point, going over the steps again and again and again.

For me, the first step in the brainstorming process is…

Step 1. Find the rhythm. Get in the mood.

VeggieTales characters have their own rhythm and feel. So when I was writing books for VeggieTales, I would start my brainstorming sessions by getting in touch with my inner vegetable and immersing my entire being (or bean) in the VeggieTales world. I found that the best way to get into a Silly Songs state of mind was to sit down and watch a VeggieTales video or two or three or four. (Writing is such a hard life.)

VeggieTales has a distinctive, quirky sense of humor, so watching the videos would help me find the VeggieTales rhythm.

I have used this same strategy when brainstorming for other types of stories, and it still works. For example, when I used to write a humor column for a Christian magazine, I would start each brainstorming session by sitting down and reading Dave Barry books, just put myself in a very silly state of mind. So whatever genre you’re writing for, read something you like in that genre to get in the mood. However, be careful you don’t wind up imitating the other writer’s style. The purpose of this step is to get in the right frame of mind, not to copy another person’s style.

In the case of VeggieTales, I should note that I did want to consciously imitate their style because, after all, the editors were looking for writers who could match the distinctive feel of a VeggieTales story.

But if you’re writing in your own voice, make sure you keep that voice.

Once I got in the right mood, it was on to…

Step 2: Find a theme.

As any faithful fan knows, each VeggieTales episode centers on a particular value. King George and the Ducky was a lesson about selfishness, Rack, Shack and Benny was a lesson in handling peer pressure, Madame Blueberry was a lesson in thankfulness, and so on.

As I continued to do more writing for VeggieTales (primarily picture books), I created a master list of close to a hundred different themes, from which I regularly drew. My VeggieTales editor usually gave me the freedom to choose a theme, so when I brainstormed an idea, I tried to come up with ideas that matched a half dozen or so different themes.

Once I selected several potential themes, it was on to…

Step 3: Write down any idea that pops in my head.

I then went to work, jotting down any crazy idea that came to mind. But there was still a method to the madness.

When I was asked to brainstorm ideas for the new Larry-Boy video, I knew that Larry-Boy always battled villains that personified various sins. For instance, the villain in the first Larry-Boy episode was the Fib from Outer Space—a monster that grew and grew, just as lies do. Therefore, I made a list of different sins, and one of them was “spreading rumors.” I then latched onto the key word “spreading” and asked myself, “What are other things that spread?”

I began to jot down ideas, anything that popped into my head. One of the words I wrote down was “fire” because fire spreads, but that seemed too violent for a VeggieTales story. Pimples spread, but that was too gross. Viruses spread, but that seemed too difficult to visualize. And then I found it. I wrote down the word “weeds” because there’s nothing peskier than weeds that take over your field or lawn.

The result was the Rumor Weed, a weed creature that spreads all across town, spreading rumors about Larry-Boy’s butler, Alfred.

Brainstorming was typically the most difficult part of the process, because once I had a good idea, writing a 1,000-word children’s book was a piece of cake in comparison.

In sum, brainstorming can be tough, but my process was quite simple: (1) Get into the rhythm or the right mood; (2) select a theme; and (3) jot down whatever comes to mind.

I continue to use this process for whatever kind of writing I’m doing, which lately has been historical novels. However, instead of waltzing with potatoes, these days I’m doing the foxtrot with Abraham Lincoln and other historical figures.

But either way, the dance goes on.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing

Procrastination and the Pen

swimming-pool-79586

By Doug Peterson

I stepped slowly out onto the board of a high dive at our local swimming pool, and I was terrified.

I was in elementary school at the time, but I still remember it vividly. I leaned out over the edge of the board and stared down in horror. From above, the drop looked a million times higher than from below. The diving board seemed so high that I thought I should be wearing a parachute, and if I could have retreated back down the ladder without losing face, I would have. I eventually jumped that day, but I didn’t do it again for years.

But what in the world do diving boards have to do with writing?

For some of us, taking the plunge and starting to write in the morning can be as painful and as intimidating as jumping off a high dive. As a result, we procrastinate. We stare out the window. We check our Facebook page. We wander downstairs for a cup of coffee. We do anything except put our fingers on the keyboard and start writing.

In my “5 for Writing” rules, which you can find at the end of this blog, my first rule is: “Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.” It sounds simple and straightforward. But for many writers, taking that first step—taking the plunge—is the most difficult part of the job. This is especially true if you’re a procrastinator by nature.

I should say up front that procrastination is not a problem that I face. But I have talked to many writers who struggle with the issue, and my wife is a therapist who has counseled people on procrastination. She explains that there are two primary forces driving procrastination—fear and comfort.

Fear. Some writers have a hard time sitting down to write because they are afraid that the ideas won’t flow, or that people who read their material will scoff (or, even worse, fall asleep). To make matters worse, they may have just read what they wrote the day before, and they’re disappointed. It sounded so much better yesterday! What happened overnight?

In my metaphor of the swimming pool, this writer’s fear is the equivalent of being afraid of jumping off the high dive. But my swimming pool metaphor doesn’t end there. The other reason that my wife says people procrastinate is…

Comfort. Writing is hard, especially when you’re trying to squeeze out those first few lines, so I compare this form of hesitation to walking SLOWLY into a cold pool. I swim twice a week, and there’s nothing more excruciating than cold water. Okay, a root canal is more painful…I’ll give you that. But for writers, those first few paragraphs can be as painful as walking slowly into a pool of ice-cold water.

In a cold pool, it’s actually less painful to jump right in than it is to wade into the water, because if you do it slowly the water will creep its way up your exposed skin, torturing you inch by inch. But this torture still doesn’t stop us from putting off that inevitable plunge into the frigid water. The same is true with writing. We try to put off the pain of actually starting, and we increase our suffering in the long run.

So just jump! Dive right in.

Keep in mind that “jumping in” doesn’t mean that you don’t plan out or ponder what you’re going to write before you begin. I do a minimal amount of outlining—just enough to know what I’m going to write that morning. But beyond that, I dive in.

Even with all of the good intentions in the world, there are always those pesky distractions and temptations, luring you to do something other than write. It’s the same at the pool. You know you need to be getting exercise, but the deck chair and snack bar are oh so tempting. Why get all wet and out-of-breath swimming laps when you can soak up the sun and drink lemonade by the pool?

Similarly, when you face your blank computer screen, you can think of so many other things you can be doing. The problem is that procrastination creates guilt. Even if you try to delay the work by doing something that you think will be more enjoyable, a sense of dread may eventually develop—especially if you have a deadline hanging over your head.

The bottom line: Procrastination might give you short-term pleasure, but it gives you long-term problems. So start writing, even if your initial work ends up in the trashcan. We all belly-flop sometimes.

So, bring to your writing the discipline of a swimmer. And before you come up with a dozen or more reasons why you shouldn’t be writing, sit down and start typing. If you’re really inspired, feel free to yell, “Cannonball!”

* * *

 5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing

Two Writing Lessons From Tolkien

Legolas, a Creative Commons illustration by JessicaLR
Legolas, a Creative Commons illustration by JessicaLR

By Doug Peterson

When J.R.R. Tolkien’s novel, The Hobbit, was published in October of 1937, it was so popular that the publisher began clamoring for a sequel—preferably to be published within a year or two. But when all was said and done, it took almost 20 years for that sequel to be written and published—the kind of slow, methodical work that probably drove the publisher nuts.

As the publisher watched and waited, Tolkien’s sequel became longer and more complicated, and the company expected to lose money. But that sequel became known as The Lord of the Rings trilogy, with the third and final volume published in 1955.

I think it’s safe to say that the books made money, so it was well worth the wait. But if you go back to when Tolkien was just starting on this sequel, he was at a loss for what he might write. At the time, he said, “I cannot think of anything more to say of hobbits.” And in another letter, he laments that “I fear I squandered all of my favorite motifs” in The Hobbit.

So let that be Lesson Number One from Tolkien: You never know what you have inside of yourself until you put it on paper. As The Lord of the Rings demonstrated, Tolkien had plenty more to say about hobbits…and dwarves and elves and men and monsters.

You never really know how much you have to say—or how good your ideas might be—until you begin to put them on paper. Ideas are like seeds. The seeds are no use if you just carry them around in your pocket, so you have to plant them. You have to sit down and write.

I have been immersed in Tolkien’s writings this fall because I am taking a class on the famed British writer at the Urbana Theological Seminary here in central Illinois. One of the highlights was a recent trip to Marquette University, which has the original manuscripts for The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit, and two lesser-known works. Marquette has handwritten pages, typed pages, and galley proofs—thousands of pages in all. Because Tolkien did a lot of writing during World War II, when paper was in short supply, we even saw some of Tolkien’s notes written on the back of Oxford Air Raid Report Forms, as well as on the backs of student essays graded by Tolkien’s good friend, C.S. Lewis.

It was fascinating to see the writing process unfold on these pages. And if I had to pull out a second lesson from Tolkien, it’s this: Edit, edit, edit.

When it comes to editing, however, you don’t have to be as obsessive as Tolkien. He couldn’t stop making changes to his story. This approach worked wonderfully for him, but that was because he was not just writing a trilogy of books. He was creating an entire world, complete with languages, maps, calendars, systems of measurement, and much more. Most of us are not attempting to create an entire world, so we may not need nearly 20 years to write our next book.

I’ll say it again: Tolkien must have driven his publisher crazy. We saw galley proofs, the final stage before printing, and they were extensively marked up with Tolkien’s handwriting. Whenever I receive galley proofs, I am afraid to make changes beyond a word correction here or there, or if I’m really brave, maybe a revised sentence. Tolkien had no such fear. We saw one galley page where he hand-wrote long paragraphs to add to the novel, and he taped the new material to the bottom of the galley proof. Remember, this was long before the personal computer age, so making changes at this stage was much more difficult.

Some writers can compose a story with very little editing. I have one writer friend who can do just that, and he has been enormously successful. Evidently, Tolkien’s friend C.S. Lewis could do that as well. That’s why Lewis was such a prolific writer, and I have heard that Tolkien was a bit envious of Lewis’s ability to write clean drafts.

Most of us probably fall somewhere in between the extremes of Lewis, who did little editing, and Tolkien, who never stopped editing. My writing needs plenty of editing, but I try to not be obsessive—although it all depends on what you call obsessive. When I write 1,000-word magazine stories, I typically get the story to where I am satisfied (which takes a fair amount of editing), and then I read it over another 10 to 15 times, just to be sure it is right. Proofing a story so many times is possible with 1,000-word stories, but not so easy with 100,000-word novels. Nevertheless, I still spend well over half of my time editing my novels.

In the case of Tolkien, his editing paid off. After all, if he hadn’t tinkered with his story, Frodo Baggins would have been called Bingo Baggins. That’s right. Frodo’s original name was Bingo. Also, if Tolkien didn’t tinker, the One Ring would not have been a powerful symbol of evil and sin. In the original published version of The Hobbit, the One Ring didn’t have the same corrupting influence. All of that came in The Lord of the Rings, so Tolkien had to go back and rework those sections of The Hobbit to make the ring more sinister.

So tinker away with your stories. But don’t edit endlessly, if you ever intend to get published…unless you’re creating an entire world. Rome wasn’t built in a day, and neither was Middle Earth.

 *  *  *

5 for Writing

  • Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  • Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  • Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  • Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  • Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

Photos courtesy of

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legolas.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hobbit_hole.jpg

 

Categories
5 For Writing

What’s Wrong With Escapist Stories?

I had a chance to see the desk where J.R.R. Tolkien wrote “The Lord of the Rings.” You can find it at the Wade Center in Wheaton, Illinois.

I still remember the day my fiction-writing teacher made it clear that he was not happy with me. However, he wasn’t unhappy about my writing. He was unhappy about what I was reading.

At the time, I was an undergraduate at the University of Illinois, so this was a long time ago. Having arrived early, I slipped a copy of the Lord of the Rings out of my backpack and began to read, minding my own business. But as I read, I sensed the eyes of my teacher boring down on me. It wasn’t exactly the evil eye of Sauron, but I could sense the teacher’s disapproval. I cannot remember the exact words that my fiction teacher used, but he essentially asked why in the world I was wasting my time reading fantasy trash.

This attitude is as old as Middle Earth. As Joseph Pearce says in the book, Tolkien: Man and Myth, many people in the literary community were scandalized when a 1997 survey of 25,000 people in Great Britain voted J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings the greatest book of the 20th Century.

“Personally,” wrote one columnist in the London Sunday Times, “I won’t keep the thing in the house…With its awful runes and maps and tedious indexes, the sight of it filled me with depression…A depressing thought that the votes for the world’s best 20th-century book should come from those burrowing an escape into a nonexistent world.”

So there it is—the word that is often flung at literature that is actually fun to read. Escapist.

Tolkien had heard the same old complaint when he was alive. In his landmark essay, “On Fairy-Stories,” he confronted the accusation head-on by saying, “I have claimed that Escape is one of the main functions of fairy-stories.” He then went on to add, “Why should a man be scorned if, finding himself in prison, he tries to get out and go home? Or if, when he cannot do so, he thinks and talks about other topics than jailers and prison-walls?”

In other words, what’s so bad about escaping? He argues that fairy-stories (they didn’t call it fantasy writing back then) should aim for Escape with a capital E.

We all seek escape in one way or another. And that’s all right, depending on what you’re using to escape and what you’re escaping from. Some forms of escape actually become an even more horrendous prisons. For example, people use drugs to escape, and they become slaves to their addiction.

But reading a rip-roaring book with heroic values? I heartily approve of that form of escape. In his essay, Tolkien talks about many positive forms of escape in fairy-stories—escape from hunger, thirst, pain, sorrow, and injustice. He even includes escape from machines such as the internal combustion engine, as fairy-stories offer an escape into a land of trees, rivers, and lakes. He also touches on the escape of archaism, into a world of dragons, knights, horses, sailing ship, elves, kings, and priests.

Our desire for escape may stem from the built-in sense that we are all strangers in a strange land, that we were created for another world—a world where pain and suffering will be no more. I love life, but I realize that this existence is not my true Home. Stories such as the Lord of the Rings remind us that there is another world, and it’s not too far away.

This built-in desire to escape is perhaps why The Great Escape, with Steve McQueen, remains my favorite war movie of all time. And perhaps this is why two of the first novels that I ever wrote were real-life escape stories. The Disappearing Man tells the true story of Henry “Box” Brown, a slave who escaped slavery in 1849 by shipping himself from Richmond to Philadelphia in a box. Another of my novels, The Vanishing Woman, is about Ellen Craft, who escaped slavery in 1848 by pretending to be a white man, while her husband posed as her slave.

As the lyrics of the popular Christian song say, “There is power in the name of Jesus to break every chain.”

If you have a chain around your ankles, what could be so wrong about breaking those chains and escaping? But maybe the critics who fling around the word “escapism” are just being sloppy in their criticism; maybe they simply mean that they think the book is poorly written.

Maybe.

I think part of the reason they use this term so freely is that some people are afraid to recognize that we all need to be freed by Someone greater than ourselves. In that sense, they actually fear the idea of escape. And as Tolkien’s good friend, C.S. Lewis, author of The Chronicles of Narnia, once observed, “The only class of people who fear escape are jailers.”

Of course, the greatest escape story of them all is the granddaddy of breakouts: the Resurrection. The authorities put Jesus in a tomb, rolled a massive rock before the entrance, and posted a contingent of well-trained guards in front. But on the third day, He escaped. He didn’t tunnel his way out, and He didn’t crawl through the sewer. He conquered Death and rolled the stone aside.

Escapist? Sure, it’s an escape. But it’s what we all desire, and it’s the only thing that will ultimately satisfy us. As Lewis also said, “If we find ourselves with a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that we were made for another world.”

* * *

5 for Writing

  • Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  • Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  • Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  • Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  • Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing

How Writing a Screenplay Can Help Your Novel

My wife, Nancy, and I ride the E.T. bike at Madame Tussauds wax museum in New York.
My wife, Nancy, and I ride the E.T. bike at Madame Tussauds wax museum in New York.

By Doug Peterson

A funny thing happened on the way to learning how to write a screenplay. I wrote a novel instead.

In 2007, I had spent the previous five years writing children’s books for VeggieTales, but I decided that I wanted to learn how to write a screenplay. So I travelled from Illinois, through Tennessee and the Blue Ridge Mountains to the first-ever Gideon Media Arts conference just outside of Asheville, North Carolina.

My screenwriting teacher, Kathy Mackel, was outstanding, and I left the conference with the first page of my screenplay written. My screenplay would tell the true story of Henry Brown, a slave who escaped from Richmond, Virginia, in 1849 by shipping himself to Philadelphia inside a box.

As it turned out, Kathy Mackel was not just a screenwriting teacher. She is also a gifted novelist, and she suggested that I write my first novel, which became The Disappearing Man—the story of Henry “Box” Brown. Even though the story wound up as a novel, I never gave up on the movie idea, and I developed it into a screenplay while I was making revisions to my novel.

By doing this, I discovered a surprising thing. I found that writing a screenplay helped me write my novel, and I also found that writing the novel helped me write the screenplay. Both forms of writing fed off of each other. Things I did in the screenplay inspired changes to the novel, and things I did in the novel inspired changes in the screenplay.

My screenplay wound up being optioned for film by a company in New York that is actively seeking funding for a movie. But my experience with the screenplay/novel dynamics convinced me of the benefits of writing my stories in both forms, even if the screenplays are never optioned. As a result, I have written screenplays for all of my novels.

Here are a few of the ways that the process of writing a screenplay can impact your novel:

Writing a screenplay makes your novel more visual. In a film, of course, visuals reign. You have no interior dialogue, as you do in a novel, so you have to rely on good acting and strong visuals.

For instance, one of the most powerful images from Henry Brown’s story can be found in two slave narratives published in 1849 and 1851. In those narratives, Henry tells about being taken by his mother to the edge of the forest in autumn when he was a child. His mother points to the trees and says, “The life of a slave, your life, is like the leaves. The wind scatters ‘em, scatters ‘em where it will. And there ain’t no getting’ ‘em back.”

The picture of the leaves in autumn became a key image in my screenplay and, as a result, a key image in my novel. Leaves in autumn became a major metaphor of the story, and it all came from thinking visually when I was writing the screenplay.

Writing a screenplay helps you to show, not tell. In fiction writing, we’re always being told, “Show, don’t tell.” Make your scene real by putting your reader in the environment with concrete details. What does the character see, smell, touch, and hear? Show how a character expresses anger; don’t just tell the reader that a character is angry.

Because films are so visual, a screenplay forces you to tell your story by showing, not telling. You have to show what’s happening. It’s a movie! You have no other choice, unless you’re planning to have a narrator talk throughout the film—a sure way to ensure that no one options your screenplay.

Writing a screenplay forces you to be concise. Every word is precious in a screenplay. After all, each page of a screenplay equals roughly one minute of a movie, so beginning screenwriters are told to aim for about 90 pages—120 pages at the very most. The tightness of the page count forces you to be a concise writer, to cut out the fat, and this helps your novel.

I realize that readers thrive on the kinds of details in a novel that you cannot get in a movie; that’s why a lot of people say, “I liked the movie, but it wasn’t as good as the book.” So I understand that it’s important to let the story breathe a little in a novel, where you aren’t so constrained by the page or word count. But the risk is that a novel will wander and become loaded down with unnecessary details. A screenplay trains you to avoid these pitfalls and to stay focused on the central plot because you do not have the luxury of wandering.

Cutting your novel down to fit into a screenplay can be a painful process, but it forces you to decide what’s most important to your story.

Writing a screenplay helps your dialogue. In most movies (but not all), characters don’t have the luxury to talk on and on and on. Therefore, I find that the dialogue in my screenplay is much snappier and faster-paced than in my novel. After I write a screenplay, I often find myself going back to the novel and trimming my wordy dialogue.

Writing novels and writing screenplays are very different processes, so not every novelist will want to tackle a screenplay. But if you love movies and think you might have a knack for screenwriting, then by all means give it a go.

To play off of the words of Forrest Gump (a book that became a movie), “Writing is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.”

That applies to both novels and screenplays.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

The Narrative Lead: A Jolt of Caffeine in Your Magazine Story

By Doug Peterson

I had no idea what I was doing when I first ordered a Café Americano, totally oblivious to its main ingredient. I didn’t realize that it contained espresso, which contains a much higher blast of caffeine than regular coffee—enough to get a sloth sprinting.

Espresso is not for me when it comes to coffee, but when I’m writing I always look for a good jolt to wake up a reader—a little editorial espresso to express myself. When I’m writing a magazine story, in particular, that often means beginning with a narrative lead. As one example, here is how I began a cover story that I wrote a couple of years ago for the University of Illinois alumni magazine:

Chances R was packed, with smoke hanging low over the raucous crowd, as the band Cheap Trick prepared to begin its set. It was the early 1970s, and looking down on the stage from one of the club’s multilevel balconies were Geoff Poor from the band Feather Train, and George Faber, the shaggy-haired singer of the Finchley Boys. 

As Cheap Trick began to play the power chords of its first song, a member of the band glanced up, spotted Faber, and motioned for him to join them on stage. Over 6 feet tall and thin as a rail (“rock weight” they call it), Faber was also one of the most electrifying showmen in the area, so he didn’t walk down—he leaped from the balcony, harmonica in hand, just as Cheap Trick launched into “Train Kept A-Rollin’.” He landed on the stage like a bolt from the blue and hurled himself into the music as the crowd erupted.

“That was the most magical rock ’n’ roll thing I had ever seen,” says Poor.

I’m always on the lookout for opportunities to begin my magazine articles with a narrative lead because everyone loves a good story. But this means you have to plan ahead and be sure you ask the kinds of questions that draw out stories from the people you interview. In my last blog, I talked about conducting interviews, but I didn’t mention the importance of drawing stories from the people whom you interview. Some people are natural born storytellers, and it doesn’t take much to get them to spin a yarn. But for others, it’s like pulling a tooth with your bare hands. I often ask for stories and anecdotes multiple times during an interview.

A narrative lead draws in a reader, but keep in mind that it can consume a lot of space. If you’re writing for a magazine with a limited number of words allotted, it might not be realistic to start with a narrative lead.

Novelists often talk about starting in the middle of the action, and that’s what I often do with my narrative leads. Here’s another one, which begins the first chapter of the book, Of Moose and Men, which I recently wrote with actor Torry Martin.

The 400-pound reindeer was going berserk, desperately trying to get out of my kitchen. Wild-eyed, it bashed me against counters and appliances as it tried to turn around in my tiny kitchen, its feet slipping and sliding on the slick floor and it’s black hooves clicking on the plywood like tap shoes.

Now freeze-frame the scene: That’s me there. I’m the one without the stubby antlers—the bearded, extra-large, hippie-looking human with blazing red hair flying in every direction, mouth wide open in terror. I look like a frightened Bigfoot in overalls.

I started in the heart of the action—a reindeer in the kitchen. Then, after dropping the reader into the middle of the scene, I soon backtracked to the beginning, explaining how in the world a reindeer wound up in a kitchen in the first place. (You have to know Torry Martin to understand how such a thing could happen.)

In the case of the rock and roll story, I had to find a smooth way to make the transition to the core of the story. This means you need a bridge that takes you from the narrative lead to the rest of the article. In the rock and roll story, I followed the quote, “That was the most magical rock ’n’ roll thing I had ever seen,” by latching onto the word “magical.” I wrote:

That is saying a lot because the 1960s and 70s were a magical time for rock ’n’ roll on the University of Illinois campus. It was a heady time across the nation, but for a community of the size of Champaign-Urbana, the ‘60s and ‘70s were unique, producing an astounding variety of music and bands.

 That’s my bridge, linking the narrative lead to rest of the story. In sum, a narrative lead needs to do three things:

  1. Be intriguing or exciting or both—a jolt of caffeine.
  2. Capture the essence of your story.
  3. Connect directly to everything that follows.

Not all interviews will give you compelling stories, and not all subjects that you write about lend themselves to narrative leads. But you might still be able to find an interesting anecdote buried somewhere in the interview. With an anecdote, you’re still telling a story, but you’re not trying to describe a detailed scene, much the way a novelist does. Because you’re not creating a scene, an anecdotal lead will typically take up fewer words than a narrative lead—an advantage when your word limit is tight.

If you can bring your reader into a club where musicians are leaping from balconies onto stages, or into a kitchen where reindeers are going berserk, you have hopefully done your first job—wake up your reader with a jolt of caffeine.

But your job has only just begun with the lead. To borrow from a famous coffee slogan, you still have your work cut out for you if you intend to craft a complete magazine article that is good to the last drop.

* * *

 5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Writing for Magazines: Conducting Interviews

journalist-985075

By Doug Peterson

Whenever I show up to interview a source for a magazine story, it must look like I have traveled from the past, like some gray-haired Marty McFly going Back to the Future. That’s because one of the first things I do is pull out my ancient Sony cassette recorder—something only a time traveler would carry.

Yes, you heard right. Cassette recorder.

Whenever I unveil this dinosaur, the person I’m interviewing usually makes some comment about not having seen one of these things since he was a toddler. But just to show that I’m not entirely ancient, I also bring out a compact, digital recorder.

I like using both digital and cassette recorders when interviewing sources for a couple of reasons. First, I am paranoid about losing my recordings, so this gives me a backup, with one copy being digital and the other analog.

Second, I actually prefer to transcribe my interviews from the cassette recorder. Until they develop a program that can automatically transcribe a digital file from audio to text, I plan to transcribe from cassettes and keep the digital copy as my permanent copy.

Up to this point, my Almost An Author blogs have all had to do with fiction writing. But I also do a considerable amount of non-fiction magazine writing, so I thought I would take you through my process over the next few columns, beginning with the interview. My background is journalism, and I have been writing non-fiction stories since my college days in the 1970s (when cassette recorders actually were hip).

Over the past 40 years, this is the interview process that I have found to work best. Some of this may or may not be for you. So, for what it’s worth, here are my steps:

Prep Work. In most cases, my job is to interview university professors about their research or alumni about their careers. In preparation, I do anywhere from a half hour to an hour and a half of background research, depending on the complexity of the subject. From this research, I prepare roughly 40 or so questions.

The Interview. I typically arrive at the location of an interview about 20 minutes ahead of time. I use the extra time to take a final review of the questions. This also gives me some extra time to locate the office of the professor I’m interviewing, enabling me to arrive at his or her office exactly on time. (I’m also a bit obsessive about punctuality.)

Of course, before I record an interview, I first ask the source’s permission. I made this mistake only once, when I was in my twenties (when I was young and foolish), and I was interviewing a prominent British Christian author. He got pretty angry when he saw me tape recording, but he probably could have been more polite in the way he asked me to switch it off. (The British bloke probably hadn’t had his morning cup of tea yet.)

By the time I actually conduct an interview, I am usually familiar enough with the questions that I rarely refer to them—although I keep them handy and occasionally glance at them. Before I end an interview, I take a final scan of the questions to make sure I covered everything.

Transcribing. Whenever I transcribe the recording of the interview, I type as fast as I can go, not stopping to correct typos. After all, I’m the only one who is going to see the transcription, so who cares about typos, as long as the text is understandable to me.

What’s nice about transcribing is that, although it can be tedious, it allows me to revisit the interview, and I begin to get a sense of the story in my mind as I transcribe. I transcribe for about a half hour at a time and then take a break, keeping myself from going bonkers.

Finally, when the transcription is complete, I read through it in its entirety, underlining and highlighting key passages. I also jot notes along the left margin of the page, indicating what topic is being covered in the corresponding sections. That way, whenever I’m trying to locate a certain topic from the transcription, I simply look at the margin notes to find the relevant section. It’s easier than scanning the text.

For the kinds of stories I write, my interviews generally last about 45 minutes to an hour, and the transcribed text is anywhere from eight to 10 pages long—single-spaced.

With the interview transcribed, I am now ready to write, which is probably the least time-consuming part of the process.

I have found this system to be thorough, effective, and hopefully foolproof with my backup recordings. Therefore, I will probably continue to use this system until the day I retire—or until my prehistoric cassette recorder finally conks out, whichever comes first. My trusty recorder might very well outlast me.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Where is the Best Spot for Writing?

IMG_6792
This is one side of my new dream office. The Lego train makes a loop on this countertop, then crosses a bridge to the other side of the office.

By Doug Peterson

Whenever I see somebody writing in a noisy coffee shop, tapping away on a laptop, I wonder how in the world they can concentrate with all of the racket surrounding them. For me, the two major requirements for writing are quiet and no interruptions. In a crowded coffee shop, you don’t get either.

So where is the ideal place to write?

There is no one-room-fits-all answer, of course. But according to Stephen King’s book, On Writing, he wrote his first two published novels in the laundry room of a trailer. He also said that John Cheever, the acclaimed short story writer, did his work in the basement near the furnace.

“Truman Capote said he did his best work in motel rooms, but he is the exception,” King continues. “Most of us do our best in a place of our own. Until you get one, you’ll find your new resolution to write a lot hard to take seriously.”

A place of your own. This sounds like good advice. King says the space “really needs only one thing: a door which you are willing to shut. The closed door is our way of telling the world and yourself that you mean business; you have made a serious commitment to write and intend to walk the walk and talk the talk.”

I do 99 percent of my writing behind a closed door in my office on a desktop computer, which I much prefer to working on a small laptop screen. I’ll write on a laptop when I’m on the road, but that’s only because flight attendants don’t look too kindly on a person setting up a desktop computer on the tiny drop-down tables in the airplane.

For years now, I have written in my second-floor office, which could best be described as “controlled chaos.” I don’t mind a bit of clutter, but oftentimes my office went from a bit of clutter to a bunch of a clutter.

But no longer. This month, I held the official ribbon-cutting ceremony for my new dream office. (We really did have a ribbon-cutting ceremony and celebratory dinner with close friends Dave and Leanne, because Dave was the one who designed and installed my new office.)

The office overhaul started with a simple desire to build new bookshelves because my current ones were old and overflowing. Then my wife came up with the brilliant suggestion that we should go a step further and create a Dr. Seuss style office. We are both fans of Seuss, and when we went to Universal Studios in Florida in 2014, we spent a lot of our time in Seussland, even though our kids are grown and weren’t with us.

The result of her suggestion was my first dream office. Although I write historical novels, I did a lot of writing for VeggieTales in the 2000’s, so my new office theme is child-inspired and includes nods to Dr. Seuss, Peanuts (my favorite comic strip), VeggieTales, and Legos. The Seuss-like bookshelves sit on a countertop that displays a Lego world, complete with a Lego train that travels from one side of the office to the other, crossing a bridge that passes in front of a window. I could describe more, but I’ll let the photos do the talking. Check them out.

As my friend Dave said, this is a dream office for a 10-year-old.

It’s a creative environment, but does an office like this make me a better writer? Probably not. But it’s loads of fun, and it certainly makes me a more organized writer. One of the great benefits of overhauling my office is that I overhauled my filing system, locating papers that I thought had disappeared forever into the black hole of my former filing system.

I will be forever grateful that my wife came up with the idea of the new office. But as wonderful and stimulating as the Lego train might be, not to mention the book pedestal and the Seuss-style hand that holds up the bridge, I have to say that the most important part of the office hasn’t changed at all.

I still have a door, and I still keep it closed when I write

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.
IMG_6785
The train crosses to this side of the office, where it makes another loop and returns to the opposite side.
IMG_6827
A Seuss-style hand holds up the train bridge.
IMG_6778
I doubled my desk space over my earlier office.
IMG_6782
The desk pedestal is made from real books, painted different colors and held together by a long steel rod.
IMG_6803
I love the Seuss-style swirls that my friend Dave created.
Categories
5 For Writing

Location, Location, Location: Doing Novel Research On-Site

 

Doug Peterson (right) with Jurgen Litfin, brother of the first person shot trying to escape into West Berlin.
Doug Peterson (right) with Jurgen Litfin, brother of the first person shot trying to escape into West Berlin.

NOTE—Doug Peterson’s previous blog, Do Your Research Right When You’re Writing Historical Fiction, discussed his research habits. This is a follow-up to that blog.

I guess I should have known what day it was when I showed up at the old watchtower in Berlin in 2011. I didn’t realize that I was arriving there on the 50th anniversary of the death of Gunter Litfin, whose memory was being honored by this very watchtower—a tower that had once been used by East Berlin guards with shoot-to-kill orders.

Back in 1961, Gunter Litfin became the first person to be shot by guards while trying to escape from Communist East Berlin into free West Berlin. Gunter was killed while trying to swim across a canal, which was located not far from this very watchtower.

When the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 and Germany reunified, Jurgen Litfin, the brother of Gunter, had the watchtower preserved as a museum in his brother’s honor. But because I showed up on the 50th anniversary of Gunter’s death—to the day—I found that the watchtower was closed in his memory.

But I didn’t give up. I was in Germany for a week doing research for my Berlin Wall novel, The Puzzle People, so I came back to the watchtower the next day. This time, I found a decent-sized crowd milling around, but no one was being allowed inside the watchtower. Standing in front of the tower was a stern-looking, elderly German man, whom I learned was Jurgen Litfin.

“Why isn’t he letting anyone inside?” I asked a woman.

“I don’t know,” she said, “but he kind of scares me.”

When I approached Litfin, I found that he didn’t speak a word of English. So, with a German man translating for me, I explained that I was writing a historical novel based on the Berlin Wall, and one of my key scenes takes place in a watchtower just like this one.

To my amazement, he allowed my wife and I—and no one else—into the watchtower. So we climbed up all three levels, and I took photographs and videos like mad.

The reason I bring up this story is that my visit inside the watchtower led me to completely revise the climactic scenes of my novel, The Puzzle People. This experience also taught me about the importance of visiting the location of your novel when doing research. Of course, some budgets will not allow visits to exotic locations, but all of my other historical novels have been located in the United States, where on-site visits are much more economical. So if your budget allows it, by all means visit the location of your story.

But when should you visit? Before you begin writing, during the writing process, or after the novel is completed?

My choice is to go after I have completed a rough draft. That way, I know what locations I need to see. Then I can make revisions based on what I saw on location, as I did with The Puzzle People. Although my watchtower scene needed some heavy reworking, in most cases a visit to the location does not require me to make drastic changes.

Last year, when I finished the rough draft of a novel based in New Orleans during the second year of the Civil War, I went to the Big Easy with a list of locations that I wanted to see and photograph. If you give talks about your novels or historical subjects covered in your stories, the photographs you take have the added benefit of providing you with plenty of visuals to use in these presentations.

But before you visit the location in person, I suggest you make some “virtual visits.” The Internet today makes it possible to get a lot of the on-site research done from the comfort of your own office. Google Earth now makes it possible to walk the streets of European cities, without having to buy an airplane ticket and take one nibble of airplane food. So if your budget doesn’t allow a trip to a foreign country, take a trip with Google Earth.

Studying the location of your story is like buying a house. It’s a good idea to explore houses online before going out and seeing them in person. But you wouldn’t buy a house without ultimately going to the home and walking through it and hiring an inspector.

It’s the same with a novel. Check out the setting online, and then visit in person—if you can. At the very least, you’ll get a nice vacation out of it.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Do Your Research Right When You’re Writing Historical Fiction

The author, Doug Peterson, received a brand-new bowler hat for Christmas this year. It brings him back to the year 1849.

I’m not sure what historical novelists did before the advent of the Internet. What takes a matter of minutes to discover on the Internet today probably took hours of library work in the pre-Web Stone Age.

A case in point: In my first historical novel, The Disappearing Man, I had a character sporting a bowler hat. But as I prepared the manuscript for the publisher, I decided to do some final fact-checking, and I thought it would be a good idea to make sure people were wearing bowler hats in the 1849 world depicted in The Disappearing Man.

They were doing no such thing.

I discovered that the bowler hat was evidently invented by two London hat-makers, Thomas and William Bowler, in 1849—the very year of my novel. However, because my story took place in America, it was highly unlikely that the London fashion made it across the Atlantic that quickly.

But this was an easy fix, so I took the bowler hat off of my character’s head and replaced it with a top hat.

It goes without saying that you have to be careful about the historical information you dig up online, so I seek out what I believe are reputable sources, such as the History Channel page, and I also check facts on multiple sites.

The Internet is wonderful for these quick fact checks, but there is still no replacing good, old-fashioned books when it comes to the heavy-lifting part of my historical research. So this is a brief rundown on how I go about my research for my historical novels. The headline above says to “do your research right,” but I should note that there is no one system that is best for everyone. We all need to find our own method. Here’s mine.

First, I should say I have been blessed by living in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, and having access to one of the greatest libraries in the country. That’s no exaggeration. The University of Illinois has the second-largest university collection in North America, and its Library and Information Sciences program is number one in the country, according to U.S. News and World Reports.

The University of Illinois may be struggling on the football field and basketball court these days, but at least the Illini can do some serious trash-talking when it comes to its books. Take that, Ohio State and Alabama!

Although I have access to the U of I library, I actually begin my hunt for historical resources on Amazon. I like the Amazon search engine, so I begin by looking for books there. For instance, I have been working on Biblical history recently, and my Amazon search has turned up some gems, such as Daily Life in the Time of Jesus, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, and The World Jesus Knew.

Once I identify some promising books, I go to the U of I library and check them out. If the book provides only a smattering of information that I need for my novel, I stick with the library copy. But if a book looks like something that I will regularly dip into throughout the course of my research, I will go back to Amazon and purchase a copy of my own. In all, I may use close to 30 books when researching a novel, and of those I will purchase about a dozen.

By having my own copy, I can freely mark up the book to my heart’s delight. As I go through the research books that I own, I jot notes at the top of the page, indicating the topics covered on that particular page. As a result, I don’t spend forever flipping through pages, trying to find that handy tidbit of information; I simply look for my notes at the top of each page.

Another key component to my historical research is digging into historical photos and videos. Again, there are so many options available today that weren’t possible just 25 years ago. If you’re doing more recent history, the options expand exponentially. For instance, one of my novels—The Puzzle People—took place in the last 50 years, so I could find a wealth of footage on YouTube.

The Puzzle People is a suspense novel based on the rise and fall of the Berlin Wall, so I went to YouTube to see film of the Wall going up, as well as footage of that magical night on November 9, 1989, when the Wall came down. One key scene in the novel took place on November 9, so some of my descriptions came straight from viewing YouTube films.

But how do you know when you’ve done enough research to begin writing?

I tend to be a rather impatient writer. I love the research, but I am always anxious to get started on a new novel. So I do not wait for all of my research to be done before I begin to venture into a new story. I do just enough research to jump-start the process, and I continue to research as I write—about a one-year process.

Think of writing as a long-distance car ride, with research being your fuel. When I travel from Illinois to Florida, I don’t carry all of the fuel I need for a single trip. I fill up the tank, which is enough to carry me for a couple hundred miles, and then I fill up along the way. It’s the same with my historical research. I do enough research in the beginning to fill my tank and get me going on the first ten chapters or so. Then I fill up the tank all along the way—going to the library and doing more research as I write. I guess that makes the library my gas station.

As amazing as the Internet is for historical writers, there’s still something about physical books and brick and mortar libraries. So let me end by tipping my hat—my bowler hat (see photo)—to librarians everywhere.

The Internet is boon for research, but there is no replacing libraries. Not yet at least.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

 

 

Categories
5 For Writing Uncategorized

Are You a Plot-Driven or Character-Driven Writer?

What comes first? Do you begin with a great plot idea, and then create characters to fill out the story? Or do you come up with an intriguing character and then try to figure what the character needs to do?

How you answer these questions says a lot about whether you are a plot-driven or character-driven writer.

I am definitely a plot-driven person because that is my starting point. Three of my four novels are based on real people from history, so at first glance you might think I’m a character-driven writer. After all, aren’t I looking for real people from history? Isn’t that where I start?

Actually, no.

In truth, I start by looking for incredible stories from history. For instance, I have written two Underground Railroad novels—one in which the slave (Henry Brown) shipped himself to freedom in a box, and the other in which the slave (Ellen Craft) escaped by pretending to be a white man, while her husband posed as her slave.

The stories of Henry Brown and Ellen Craft were what drew me to them, not their personalities—although both of them happened to be fascinating people in their own right. But I still started with their stories.

So what are you—a plot-driven or character-driven writer?

I was first posed with this question when I attended a conference course taught by Jeff Gerke, a fiction editor who specializes in science fiction and fantasy. After attending his class, I ran out to buy his book, Plot Versus Character: A Balanced Approach to Writing Great Fiction—a book I recommend.

“I believe there are two types of novelists,” Gerke says in Plot Versus Character. “On the one hand you have those for whom plot ideas come naturally. On the other, you have those for whom characters arise with ease. Plot-first novelists think of story ideas all day long. Theirs are the fabulous books in which many exciting things happen. The focus tends to be on the events occurring in the story rather than on the characters, and usually, lots of things blow up. I know about this kind of novelist,” he says, “because I’m one of them.

“Character-first novelists are those writers who are endlessly fascinated by what makes people tick,” Gerke continues. “The fictional people they create are rich, engaging, believable, and compelling. You feel that those people truly exist.”

Gerke goes on to explain that many plot-driven writers have a tendency to neglect good character development, and as a result their characters become one-dimensional. I love some of the late Michael Crichton’s novels, such as Jurassic Park, but he was clearly a plot-driven writer, and his characters often come across as the same, from novel to novel.

Then there are the novelists who create fascinating characters, but the characters don’t do anything but meander through a story world in which not much happens. As unique and real as these characters might be, I quickly lose interest if they’re not doing anything.

That’s why Jeff Gerke wrote his book Plot Versus Character—to help character-driven writers improve their plots and to help plot-driven writers improve their character development.

Since I’m a plot-driven writer, I always have to work extra hard to make sure I don’t neglect my characters. To do this, I ask the following questions about my main characters:

  • What are my character’s flaws? What is his or her major flaw?
  • What are my character’s strengths?
  • What does he or she look like?
  • What is his or her personality? Extrovert, introvert, depressed, excitable, etc.?
  • What is my character’s backstory?
  • What is my character’s arc? How does he or she change over the story?
  • What does he or she fear?
  • What does my character want?
  • What secrets does he or she keep?
  • Who are the character’s closest friends?
  • What was my character’s upbringing like?
  • Does he or she have any quirks?
  • What is my character’s calling, or mission, in life?
  • What is the internal conflict?
  • What is the external conflict?

I end this list with both internal and external conflict because conflict is the bridge where the character-driven and plot-driven worlds overlap. A character-driven writer may give the lead character a lot of internal conflict, but neglect the external conflict. For the plot-driven writer, it’s often the reverse. So strive for both: strong characters with internal conflict and strong plots with external conflict.

In basketball, less experienced players usually rely on their dominant hand, often the right hand. Kids can get away with this when they are young players, but if you want to excel in basketball, you have to work on your weak hand. You have to be just as comfortable using your left as your right hand.

It’s the same with writing. Find out which is your “strong hand”—character or plot. Then work on your weak hand.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

 

Categories
5 For Writing

Put a Soundtrack to Your Fiction

Violins

“Where words fail, music speaks,” said Hans Christian Andersen, writer of such legendary stories as The Little Mermaid (not the Disney version) and The Snow Queen (the inspiration for Disney’s Frozen).

I make a living with words, and so did Hans Christian Andersen, but I know exactly what he meant when he said that music can do what words cannot. Sometimes, just the snippet of a song can bring up a well of emotions and memories that all the words in the world cannot. If you have ever watched a scene from a movie, presented with and without the music, you can see the difference that a good soundtrack makes, and you get a greater appreciation for just how important music can be in storytelling.

But we’re talking about writing books, not watching a movie! Until e-books come equipped with musical soundtracks, what in the world does music have to do with fiction?

Music may not play a role in the experience of reading fiction, but I have found that it does play a part in writing fiction. When I write a novel, I find it helpful to select musical themes that connect me with certain characters or put me in touch with certain scenes. For example, I have been working on a new historical novel, based on a true story that took place during the second year of the Civil War, and I stumbled across a song that fit the mood of my two main characters—a husband and wife. I call the song “André and Felicie’s Theme,” although it is actually called “Beethoven’s Secrets,” and it’s performed here by the Piano Guys. Check it out:

Video: “BEETHOVEN’S SECRETS,” by the Piano Guys

When I was writing this new novel, I would often listen to “Beethoven’s Secrets” before I sat down to work on scenes with André and Felicie. The music would put me in the right frame of mind, or rather “the right frame of heart,” because it would bring up the emotions that I needed to write.

As another example, take my second novel, The Puzzle People, which follows the fate of two couples who were split apart when the Berlin Wall went up in 1961. One of the characters, Elsa, is a tortured soul, and the Evanescence song, “My Immortal,” fits her story nicely. The lyrics, as well as the music, captured the feeling of the losses in Elsa’s life.

Here is a video that displays those lyrics while “My Immortal” plays:

Video: “MY IMMORTAL,” by Evanescence

Sometimes, when I find an inspiring song, I don’t always use it to connect with a specific character or scene. In some cases, a song captures the mood of the entire novel. Again, let me use an example from my Berlin Wall novel, The Puzzle People. While writing that novel, I often began my work day by listening to a song from the Scorpions, “Wind of Change”—a song that celebrated the fall of the Berlin Wall and went on to become one of the top-selling singles worldwide of all time.

This video begins with a long musical introduction, accompanied by sobering statistics about the Berlin Wall. Then, about 1 minute and 50 seconds into the song, the lyrics begin and so do some of the most iconic images dealing with the rise and fall of the Wall. So here is the “Wind of Change” video, and I recommend you stick with it until the images and lyrics begin at 1:50 into the song.

Video: “WIND OF CHANGE,” by the Scorpions

When we write, we all want to draw certain emotions out of our readers, and to do that we first need to draw out these emotions in ourselves. And what better way to do this than through music? Your reader will not hear these songs when they read your story, but perhaps some of the emotion from the music will make its way onto your page and into your characters’ lives and stories.

As Hans Christian Andersen said, “Where words fail, music speaks.” But sometimes the right music can inspire you to put the right words on the page—words that don’t fail.

* * *

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.

Photo credit:  Gavin Whitner

Categories
5 For Writing

The Perils of Head-Hopping in Fiction

Disappearing Man
The editor had me rework my first novel, changing it from the omniscient point of view to third-person limited. I’m so glad he did. I was no longer writing for talking vegetables and had many lessons to learn.

I used to write for VeggieTales, and if you’re familiar with the antics of Bob the Tomato and Larry the Cucumber, you know that these animated characters do a lot of hopping around. How else are vegetables going to move? They don’t have legs.

But when I made the switch from writing VeggieTales picture books to writing historical novels, I found myself doing a different kind of hopping. It’s called “head-hopping,” and the editor on my first novel quickly cured me of the habit. I’m so glad he did. In fact, this was the first lesson I learned when making the switch from picture books to novels.

My first historical novel, The Disappearing Man, tells the true story of Henry “Box” Brown, a slave who mailed himself to freedom in 1849. He escaped by shipping himself in a box from Richmond, Virginia, to Philadelphia. But when I began writing that novel, I just happened to be reading Lonesome Dove, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Larry McMurtry. Many of McMurtry’s novels are written in the “third person omniscient” voice, in which the author can get into anyone’s thoughts at any time. So, driven by McMurtry’s example, I wrote my first draft from the omniscient point of view, hopping into Henry “Box” Brown’s mind in one paragraph and then hopping into another character’s mind in the next paragraph.

How could anyone argue with McMurtry’s approach? He’s a Pulitzer Prize-winner for crying out loud!

As much as I loved Lonesome Dove, I quickly saw my editor’s point. Head-hopping, as the omniscient point of view is sometimes called, has problems. But before I explain these problems, let me give you an example of head-hopping. Here is an excerpt from The Disappearing Man, where Henry Brown, as a child, stumbles across another boy (John) tied up to a tree. For the purposes of this example, I have changed the excerpt so it reads in the omniscient voice.

Henry had been taught not to interfere in the ways of white folk, but he couldn’t just leave John to die. On the other hand, if Mr. Allen found out he’d untied his son, the man might shoot him dead in the field.

Another flash of lightning, another explosion.

John hollered, then whimpered like a beaten dog. The boy was almost as terrified of the lightning as he was of his father. John looked around, wondering if his Pappy might appear from behind a tree at any moment.

This is the third-person omniscient voice because in the first paragraph we’re inside Henry’s mind, understanding his thoughts and feelings about getting shot by Mr. Allen (John’s father). In the third paragraph, we’re suddenly in John’s thoughts, hearing his fears. If you constantly move from one perspective to another, paragraph to paragraph, you lose focus on any one character.

I highly recommend the wonderful book, Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, by Renni Browne and Dave King, which my editor suggested to me back when I was writing my first novel. The third chapter of the book deals with the issue of point of view, so imagine my shock when I found that the chapter began with an excerpt from McMurtry’s Lonesome Dove. In the excerpt, we get into the thoughts of three different characters—Joe, July, and Elmira—in the span of three brief paragraphs.

That’s some serious head-hopping.

“Larry McMurtry’s Lonesome Dove is a powerfully written book, yet some readers find it hard to get involved in the story,” Browne and King say in Self-Editing for Fiction Writers. They blame this problem on the omniscient point of view that McMurtry used.

The omniscient point of view gives a writer a lot of flexibility because you can reveal any character’s thoughts at any time. But by jumping from one person’s perspective to another to another, it’s more difficult to create intimacy between the reader and the characters. You’re not sticking with one character’s perspective long enough to become strongly connected with him or her.

When my editor looked at my first draft of The Disappearing Man, he sent me back to the drawing board, and I converted my omniscient voice to “third-person limited.” And I had only a few weeks to do it.

But what is third-person limited, and why did I choose it?

To answer this, I need to devote an entire blog to the question, so look for an explanation in my next installment. For now, I simply leave you with one piece of advice: If you want to create intimacy between readers and characters, don’t head-hop.

Leave the hopping to vegetables.

 

5 for Writing

  1. Get writing. Find the time to write. Then do it.
  2. Learn by listening—and doing. Solicit feedback, discern what helps you.
  3. Finish your story. Edit and rewrite, but don’t tinker forever. Reach the finish line.
  4. Thrive on rejection. Get your story out there. Be fearless. Accept rejection.
  5. Become a juggler. After one story is finished, be ready to start another. Consider writing two at once.