Categories
Building Your Creative Space

How a Novel Came to Be, Part Two

Read the first half of the story here to learn how hopes were raised and then dashed.

In the dark weeks that followed, some unexpected glimmers of light appeared.  Producer-director Bart Gavigan (End of the Spear, Luther) and Emmy and Bafta-winning writer-director Norman Stone (Shadowlands) read my unpublished manuscript.  Film executives at this level are inundated with scripts.  For them to take the time to read a novel – five times the length of a feature-film screenplay – was a huge gift.  As was their response.  Both were unreservedly positive and urged me to begin work on the script.  Bart went so far as to offer detailed notes on how he felt the screenplay should be shaped; I liked these so much I decided to incorporate them into the novel.

A few months later, my newly-completed screenplay was passed to Ileen Maisel, producer of Golden Compass and many others.  She invited me to a meeting at Claridges, where she had taken up temporary station.  She informed me that it was impossible for her to take the project herself, as she was fully committed to a new series (The Dresden Files, soon to be aired on ABC).  But she liked my work, and wanted to remain in contact.

As a result of this meeting, Island of Time then journeyed to Los Angeles.  Soon after, so did I.

My third Hollywood meeting was with David Lipman (producer of Shrek and Ironman), then president of Starlings Entertainment, and his DD Emily Gottlich.  They both were the exact opposite of everything I’d been led to believe about top-tier Hollywood executives.  They were soft-spoken, highly intelligent, and as gentle as they were intense.  Because they had simply asked to meet, without any actual response to my story, I had been warned by others that they probably liked my writing but were not interested in that particular script.  So I had practiced pitching two other stories.  For days.

Their offices were in a brand new building on the corner where Wiltshire Boulevard met the Pacific Ocean.  Not really.  Wiltshire actually dead-ends into Ocean Avenue, which then fronts a narrow park, then the cliff which drops down to the PCH, then the beach and the Santa Monica Pier.  But when I exited the elevator and entered the Starlings penthouse offices, all I could see through the wall of glass was…

Blue.

And storm clouds.  And rain.  Because it was a freezing rain-swept February day in Los Angeles.  For which David and Emily apologized.  Like I was expected to be seriously bothered by the weather. 

So I there I was, poised on the edge of their designer sofa, with the two of them seated with their backs to the Pacific.  Ready for them to ask if I had anything else I could offer…

The words they spoke just didn’t seem to fit inside my head. 

It actually took a while for their news to register.  Probably thirty seconds.  Less.  But it felt like hours.  Then…

They loved my script.  They wanted to buy it.  Not option.  Buy.  Put it into production.  Immediately.  They had decided to approach David Womark, producer of such hits as Deepwater Horizon, to run the project. 

Boom.

I have flashing images of what happened after.  They wanted to know if I had a sequel.  Thankfully, I was so deeply engaged with the story that I already had an idea.  I pitched that, scarcely believing what I was hearing from them. 

Sometime later, I left.  Floated down the park.  Called my wife.  Drove to the hotel.  Too excited.  Walked through the wind and the rain.  For hours.

The next thing I heard was, their legal department would not get around to sending me the T&C Sheet (contractual terms and conditions, negotiated before the contract itself is penned) until after Cannes.  At the time, the news was mildly hilarious – my project was delayed because of something they needed to get ready for presenting in France, and the same should happen to my film the following year. 

My film.

The next four months seemed endless.  A few high notes were reached; film budgeted at thirty million, my payment upon first day of filming was to be six hundred thousand dollars, and so forth.  But mostly it was a time of tension, and trying to stay patient, and unanswered phone calls to the legal department. 

Like I said, endless.

Four months stretched to five, then six, and suddenly the summer was over and autumn had started, and then autumn was winding into winter, and I still did not have the actual contract. 

When the phone call finally came, it almost felt like I knew what had happened before the connection was made.  Karine Martin, CEO of Starlings, told me in our first-ever conversation that Starlings was being sold.  And the buyers only wanted their television division and their film-investment fund.  And all of the current film projects were being dropped.  And earlier that day, David Lipman had been fired.

Those words still weigh several thousand pounds.  Each.

I actually don’t think the acquisition ever went through.  Covid was probably the reason.  In any case, Starlings is still an indie production group, and Karine Martin is still CEO.  But what I think happened was this.  And David Lipman, now a personal friend, agrees.

The acquirer was probably Lionsgate.  And this illustrates a major issue I’ve faced from the beginning with Island of Time.  And a barrier that David has confronted his entire career.

The standard tracks expected within contemporary fantasy run one of two ways.  Either they hold to the teenage-angst-and-romance structure (Buffy, Twilight), or they are very dark indeed (World War Z).  There are huge hits within both directions; and these structures represent common threads in contemporary entertainment. 

And then there are people who seek a different path. 

But current themes and directions in entertainment are not the topic here.  So I will close with three possible takeaways for all you future creative stars.

First, my aim from the beginning was to apply a classical heroic structure to neartime fantasy.  Use the naturally occurring elements of light and dark, good and evil, and magnify them by adding magic to this world.  This core concept was a vague hope when I began writing.  It came naturally; it is in some respects who I am as an artist.  But it was only through this trial by fire that I started drawing this into crystalline focus.

If or when you face your own impossible delays, ask yourself this question.  What lies at the very deepest level of my creative urge?  What is it that drives me to create?  What is most important?  And how is it represented in this specific work? 

Which brings us to the second takeaway, which is:

Beyond these core elements, do your best to remain open to critiques, and flexible to what needs improvement.  Or change.  Or cutting out entirely.  This disciplined balance is crucial to your future.  And your success.

And finally, accept the risk that such experiences may indeed be part of your own future. 

When I speak with other full-time artists, particularly those working in Hollywood, and tell them about these events, there is a been-there-done-that element to their sympathy.  It is, I’m sorry to say, part of the profession. 

Last month my wife and I were invited to the premier of the new theater-musical, Back To The Future.  Robert Zemeckis and his writing partner, Bob Gates, were there and spoke to the audience at its conclusion.  They described the trials and hardship they went through to get the film done; it took them seven years from the completion of the script to the first day of principal photography. 

I wish you every success. 

Davis Bunn’s novels have sold in excess of eight million copies in twenty-four languages.  He has appeared on numerous national bestseller lists, and his titles have been Main or Featured Selections with every major US book club.  In 2011 his novel Lion of Babylon was named Best Book of the Year by Library Journal.  The sequel, entitled Rare Earth,  won Davis his fourth Christy Award for Excellence in Fiction in 2013.  In 2014 Davis was granted the Lifetime Achievement award by the Christy board of judges.  His recent title Trial Run has been named Best Book of The Year by Suspense Magazine. Lately he has appeared on the cover of Southern Writers Magazine and Publishers Weekly, and in the past three years his titles have earned him Best Book and Top Pick awards from Library Journal, Romantic Times, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, and Kirkus. His most recent series, Miramar Bay, have been acquired for world-wide condensation-books by Readers Digest. Currently Davis serves as Writer-In-Residence at Regent’s Park College, Oxford University. Until Covid struck, he was speaking around the world on aspects of creative writing. 

Watch an excerpt from his new book The Cottage on Lighthouse Lane here.

Watch for Davis Bunn’s novel, Island of Time, to be released by Severn House/Cannondale UK in April 2022

Categories
Guest post archive

HOW THE LAMBS ROAR-By Martin Johnson. Interview with Brian Bird

 

As an English major in the 90s, I was excited to learn my craft and be creative. However, I was clueless about what to create. Then one day, I bought a book that changed how I viewed my passion for writing.

The late Bob Briner’s classic The Roaring Lambs challenged Christians to use their talents to create positive and redemptive art across the spectrum of entertainment: sports, music, art, television, and film. Briner called Hollywood a “Mission field!”[i]

Recently, I sat down with 30 year Hollywood veteran Brian Bird (The Case for Christ, When Calls The Heart) to talk about how the lambs (the church) can roar in this mission field.

Martin Johnson: I know you are a fan of the Roaring Lambs, how has the film industry changed since it came out in the 90s?

Brian Bird: Oh yes, love the book! Prior to the book, For much of the 20th century, I think Christians working in the arts were few and far between, with the exception of music.  There were a handful of believers working in the film industry, but a lot of that activity was specifically on church films, small-time evangelistic church films. But there was not a real attempt to break into the mainstream audience with Christian films; for the most part, evangelicals were M.I.A.

Martin Johnson: You used an interesting word there, evangelicals. As a filmmaker, what does it mean to be an evangelical filmmaker?

Brian Bird:  There are filmmakers who are Christians who make sermons on film. There are Christian filmmakers who don’t make specifically evangelistic films, and there are filmmakers who are evangelicals who don’t make Christian films. You can even be a non-believer and make a terrific evangelical film. It’s all about telling great stories.

Martin Johnson: Briner expressed how the church needs writers.  What do you hope to accomplish at the end of the day?

Brian Bird:   My personal mission is to tell stories that stir up cravings in people’s souls, make them want to know God—to be effective as I can be at communicating my Christian worldview through good story-telling, to tell stories that don’t beat people over the head, but, stir up soul cravings.  To me those are the best kind of faith films. Sometimes evangelistic films can be neither good evangelism nor good filmmaking; because their intent from the beginning is propaganda. There are good uses for propaganda. Propaganda in the most generous sense of the world can be put to good use as evangelism. The Jesus films have been effective at that.  A good example of that is The Jesus Film—very effective.  Those kinds of films are good and effective, but that is not what I’ve been called to do. I’ve been called to just tell great, true, redemptive stories that are not there just to entertain, but to provoke hearts to greater self-reflection and get people talking about the water cooler.  In my view, the story of Jesus and his work on the cross needs to be shared between two flesh and blood people having a conversation. Not by a picture on a wall.

Martin Johnson: What is the main roadblock keeping Christian film from being successful at the box office?

Brian Bird:   Ourselves. . .the church! If evangelicals are going to make a difference in the giant media conversation going on across the world, we, have to pursue excellence in our crafts of communicating. The church must support the gifts of creative evangelicals when it does the message and the art can soar! During the Renaissance, the church supported all the great artists of that time and people like Michelangelo were able to strive for excellence because of that support. Art in humans is always a reflection of the creativity behind the creation of the universe. The Renaissance artists were trying to bring heaven to earth with their creations, as CS Lewis said… all art from men is an attempt to copy heaven. We are made in the image of our creator; it is in our DNA to create. This was evident in the Renaissance, the Reformation; the church stopped supporting the arts.  The theology of the church began to view all art as worldly and considered it sinful. But that is so counterintuitive to the truth in the Bible. The view of art became worldly, it was considered sinful. God was the first writer … in the beginning was the Word (John 1:1–4). The Bible is full of references to the beauty and art in creation, and yet for several hundred years the church left art behind in favor of the “good enough principal.” We need to get back to pursuing excellence in Hollywood and that to me is the biggest obstacle facing us, the good enough principle. That’s where art has been relegated in the church and it has to stop—this attitude that art doesn’t have to be excellent, all it has to be is useful. We need to strive for excellence, not for our own glory—but for the glory of our creator, God. We can trust Him with our talents.

 

Brian Bird on the set of, “When Calls the Heart”

 

 

Martin Johnson: I’m glad you mentioned trusting God, Briner says that the lambs can trust their Shepherd.

Brian Bird: Throughout history, all art has been passed down from one generation to the next through a process called “Copy the Master.” In an art class, for example, the Master, or the teacher, is at the front of the room painting or sculpting, and the students are at their canvass.  They copy the Master but bring themselves to the canvass in order to learn our art. Well, we are all in the class with the author of the universe—that’s quite a source to copy from. And we can trust our Master with every creative bone in our bodies.

Martin Johnson: Briner says art is a full-time ministry. What do you think?

Brian Bird:   He was absolutely right; it is how we answer our God-given calling. Every person who finds Jesus needs to strive to become a minister out of the skills and talents God has gifted them with, both inside and outside the church.

Martin Johnson: Briner points out that part of our ministry is being the salt of the earth. Thus, for Christians to be roaring lambs in Hollywood we can’t just be just entertaining, we need to be ministers of the gospel.

Brian Bird We should be telling great stories, but they have to stir up soul cravings in people. We need to tell stories that help people realize there is more to life than what this world offers. Great stories have great messages. If they’re not entertaining though, they are not good stories. We have to do both. We have to tell stories that transfix our audiences; you have to keep your audience entertained so they can organically receive the meta-narrative or message, that is at the heart of your story.

Martin Johnson: In closing, what do you see the church doing to become the roaring lambs Briner described in his book?

Brian Bird: I think that is starting to happen. I think there’s a new renaissance beginning. I am witnessing it around me, in younger people that I mentor in filmmaking. I have this film coming out September 14th I executive produced called The Heart of Man and I shepherded a group of incredibly young talented filmmakers. I am so proud of them and proud of what we are making. I think it’s about all of us who are in this business encouraging one another to push for excellence, not to settle for just good enough, to practice the 10,000 -hour rule and to be bold. Some people who are born with a spark of genius need to put in their 10,000 hours in order to get really good at what they do. That’s how genius become experts.  All of us are born with that spark because we are made in the image of the author of all things. But if we sit on our hands and don’t put in the time to become experts, we will never be the roaring lambs Bob Briner was hoping for.

[i] Briner, P (1993).  The Roaring Lambs. Grand Rapids: Zondervan

Brian Bird “When Calls the Heart Devotion” with Michelle Cox

Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/When-God-Calls-Heart-Devotions/dp/1424556066

 

Martin is a forty-three-year-old award-winning Christian screenwriter who has recently finished his first Christian nonfiction book after three years of researching, editing and remembering.

While majoring in English, he walked away from the Christian faith to experience the grandeur and luster of college life. While dating, he delved into different spiritual beliefs—from Hinduism to Catholicism and Judaism.Martin’s journey took him on a journey for answers.

In March of 1997, Martin received his answer. Albeit, not the answer he wanted. Nearly dying in a severe car accident, he survived with a  (T.B.I.) Traumatic brain injury which left him legally blind and partially paralyzed on the left side.

After enduring eleven months of humiliating rehabilitation and therapy, Martin found himself at the foot of the cross with a choice to make. It was then Martin realized to truly live, he had to die. Not physically but in every other area of his life. There could be no compromise.

Martin has spent the last nine years volunteering as an ambassador and promoter for Promise Keepers ministries. While speaking to local men’s ministries Martin shares his testimony. Martin explains The Jesus Paradigm and how following Jesus changes what matters most in our lives.

Martin lives in a Georgia and connects with readers at https://spiritualperspectivesofdasingleguy.blogspot.com/ and on Twitter at https://twitter.com/mtjohnson51. He is also a contributing writer at Faith & Fitness Magazine and the Christian Film Database.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Screenwriting

From Script to Stage/Screen: Part 2

In our first article, we looked at how research was vital to prepare any director to present a script onto the stage or screen. Before an audience ever sees any kind of finished product, or really before the first rehearsal even begins, the director is faced with four major responsibilities. These four responsibilities include Research, Scripting, Reality, and Moments. This second column will explore how to read between the lines of any script to get the message intended for the audience.

Scripting

[bctt tweet=”As a producer or writer seeks a director to put their ideas into a visible reality” username=””], there is always the early meeting where many things are discussed. The first thing to be communicated is the basic theme of the play or musical. Once the director is intrigued, a script is usually given. The script is the playbook from which all decisions are made. The script gives you the basic who, what, when and where and now of any production. Yet, all questions are not answered and that is where the author usually gives the director interpretive control of what is produced. There are some writers who retain tight control of their intellectual property. One example is J. K. Rowling who had power over almost every decision of the Harry Potter series. But, in most cases, the writer takes a backseat to those putting up the money (the producers) and the director who interprets the script.

The director is given a wide range of discretion when putting the words of an author on stage or screen. Take for example the script of Jesus Christ Superstar. In one of the first act’s great songs, Mary Magdalene sings “I Don’t Know how to Love Him”, while Jesus is asleep. The stage directions say that Mary is unconditionally in love with Jesus.  Every stage production I’ve seen has Jesus asleep while she sings.

What is different is Mary Magdalene’s approach to the song. In the original 1973 movie, Mary is nearby Jesus and you are not sure if Mary is in love with Jesus as a man or as a follower. In the 2000 movie version, Mary is almost fondling Jesus as he sleeps. There is no doubt that her love for Jesus is merely sexual in nature. In a national touring Broadway production, Mary lies down on top of Jesus at the end of the song as the lights faded on the scene. Here, it is implied that Jesus and Mary Magdalene have relations.

So, which is the right approach? Which director was correct in their interpretation of the script? To answer that question, you would have to ask Andrew Lloyd Webber himself. In an interview, less than a year old, Mr. Webber mentions that Mary Magdalene does fall in love with Jesus, the man. So, was our first director mistaken? The simple answer is no. The romance was implied through the subtle direction rather than taking a tree branch and hitting us over the head to make that statement like our last example.

This is where good research comes into play. IS there any historical evidence that Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ had anything other than a master/follower relationship? These answers then will lead you to our third responsibility of reality versus implied situations. We will focus on this aspect in our next article.

[bctt tweet=”Characters have personalities and certain characteristics that must be shown consistently on stage.” username=””] You need to keep focus where focus needs to be. Sometimes the stage directions need interpreting or need clarification. That is where a smart director will keep the focus on what is most important to the plot of the script.

Disney World’s Hollywood Studios, presents a short live-action presentation of Beauty and the Beast. Gaston urges the villagers to hunt down the Beast, but there is one man who is visibly struggling with this decision. A woman tries to get this villager to resist joining the mob. All this is happening while Gaston is singing, “Kill the Beast.” I watched the exchange between the wife and man instead of Gaston. I do not know if they intended to distract from the main singer, but obviously there was a message that the director wanted to get across. These are the kind of decisions made each day by directors all over the world. All of these possibilities can be interpreted through the script or libretto. Though the writer created the script, the director becomes the storyteller. [bctt tweet=”What story and messages are you planning on delivering to your audience?” username=””] Only you can answer that question as you prepare for your first rehearsal.

Dr. Jim Tippins is currently President of On the Edge Productions, Inc., a resource for Christian scripts and minister aids. An award winning author, Dr. Tippins is proud to share the stories that God has laid on his heart. He has produced, written, and directed scripts, musicals, reviews, and plays all over the country. He has performed with the Kentucky Opera, Overture Opera Company, Theater of the Republic, Swamp Fox Players, Community Choral Society, Florence Symphony and Long Bay Symphony. To see resources and more information, please visit,

www.ontheedgeproductions.org. Or join his blog at drjimtippins.com